Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Jo Matthan
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
There is often an expectation that any educational institution worth its salt will be at the forefront of technological advances. An often unchallenged and somewhat romanticised viewpoint persists that, in all cases, technology is best. What is not always openly discussed is the evidence base and pedagogy behind the use of technology, visualisation and traditional approaches of teaching within the fields of medical and anatomy education curricula. There are many advantages to using technology within the learning environment but, often, it is possible to achieve the same outcomes through the use of many other non-technological instructional modalities. The frequent shortcoming when institutions use technology is that there is a lack of integration across the curriculum, a failure to map to the blueprint, little attempt to include technology in the feedback cycle and assessment, and insufficient time and resource allocation for educators developing resources. Without careful implementation and integration, it can appear that institutions are throwing the latest developments at students without due care and consideration to the evidence-base and without the necessary institutional support for staff and resource development. This is not the fault of educators; the competing demands on staff time and institutional drive to climb the ranking tables means that technology is often perceived as the quick fix.
Author(s): Finn GM, Matthan J
Editor(s): Paul M. Rea
Publication type: Book Chapter
Publication status: Published
Book Title: Biomedical Visualisation
Online publication date: 28/03/2019
Acceptance date: 02/04/2018
Series Title: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
Place Published: Cham
PubMed id: 30919294
Library holdings: Search Newcastle University Library for this item