Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Francisco ArealORCiD
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
There is an on-going debate on the environmental effects of genetically modified crops to which this paper aims to contribute. First, data on environmental impacts of genetically modified (GM) and conventional crops are collected from peer-reviewed journals, and secondly an analysis is conducted in order to examine which crop type is less harmful for the environment. Published data on environmental impacts are measured using an array of indicators, and their analysis requires their normalisation and aggregation. Taking advantage of composite indicators literature, this paper builds composite indicators to measure the impact of GM and conventional crops in three dimensions: (1) non-target key species richness, (2) pesticide use, and (3) aggregated environmental impact. The comparison between the three composite indicators for both crop types allows us to establish not only a ranking to elucidate which crop is more convenient for the environment but the probability that one crop type outperforms the other from an environmental perspective. Results show that GM crops tend to cause lower environmental impacts than conventional crops for the analysed indicators
Author(s): Areal FJ, Riesgo L
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Ecological Indicators
Year: 2015
Volume: 52
Pages: 498-516
Print publication date: 01/05/2015
Online publication date: 23/01/2015
Acceptance date: 04/01/2015
ISSN (print): 1470-160X
ISSN (electronic): 1872-7034
Publisher: Elsevier BV
URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.008
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric