Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Electrocardiographic conduction and repolarization markers associated with sudden cardiac death: moving along the electrocardiography waveform

Lookup NU author(s): Shayo Oshodi

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

The QT interval along with its heart rate corrected form (QTc) are well-established ECG markers that have been found to be associated with malignant ventricular arrhythmogenesis. However, extensive preclinical and clinical investigations over the years have allowed for novel clinical ECG markers to be generated as predictors of arrhythmogenesis and sudden cardiac death. Repolarization markers include the older QTc, QT dispersion and newer Tpeak - Tend intervals, (Tpeak - Tend) / QT ratios, T-wave alternans (TWA), microvolt TWA and T-wave area dispersion. Meanwhile, conduction markers dissecting the QRS complex, such as QRS dispersion (QRSD) and fragmented QRS, were also found to correlate conduction velocity and unidirectional block with re-entrant substrates in various cardiac conditions. Both repolarization and conduction parameters can be combined into the excitation wavelength (λ). A surrogate marker for λ is the index of Cardiac Electrophysiological Balance (iCEB: QT / QRSd). Other markers based on conduction-repolarization are [QRSD x (Tpeak-Tend) / QRSd] and [QRSD x (Tpeak-Tend) / (QRSd x QT)]. Advancement in technology permitted sophisticated electrophysiological analyses such as principal component analysis and periodic repolarization dynamics to further improve risk stratification. This was closely followed by other novel indices including ventricular ectopic QRS interval, the f99 index and EntropyXQT, which integrates mathematical and physical calculations for determining the risk markers. Though proven to be effective in limited patient cohorts, more clinical studies across different cardiac pathologies are required to confirm their validity. As such, this review seeks to encapsulate the development of old and new ECG markers along with their associated utility and shortcomings in clinical practice.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Reynard JT, Oshodi OM, Lai JC, Lai RW, Bazoukis G, Fragakis N, Letsas KP, Korantzopoulos P, Liu F-Z, Liu T, Xia Y, Tse G, Li CK

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Minerva cardioangiologica

Year: 2019

Volume: 67

Issue: 2

Pages: 131-144

Print publication date: 01/04/2019

Acceptance date: 02/04/2016

ISSN (print): 0026-4725

ISSN (electronic): 1827-1618

Publisher: Edizioni Minerva Medica

URL: https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4725.18.04775-8

DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4725.18.04775-8

PubMed id: 30260143


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share