Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Mark Freeston,
Dr Richard Thwaites
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
© British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2019. Self-Practice/Self-Reflection (SP/SR) has been proposed both as an adjunct to therapy training programmes, and also as a means for therapist development among experienced therapists. Research suggests it develops aspects of knowledge and skill that may not be addressed through other training methods. With increasing interest in SP/SR, a growing evidence base regarding both participant benefits and potential risks from SP/SR, and the development of SP/SR programmes across a range of therapeutic modalities, we argue it is timely to identify a set of principles that can guide the design, adaptation and implementation of SP/SR programmes. At this stage, there is little empirical evidence to guide trainers wishing to implement SP/SR in different contexts. Accordingly, these principles have been derived from reflection on developing, testing and implementing SP/SR programmes as well as on other training and supervisory experience. The first set of principles detailed in Section 1 draw on various theories of learning and development and frame the processes involved, the next principles speak to the content of SP/SR programmes, and the final principles address structure. Within Section 2, the principles are then considered for their practical implications. In Section 3, the sharing of what are initially private self-reflections is then considered together with some implications for SP/SR programmes, especially when there is assessment involved. We argue that SP/SR will continue to progress with well-designed standard programmes, careful implementation, thoughtful adaptation, ongoing innovation, and especially more evaluation.Key learning aims (1)To understand the principles for designing, adapting and implementing SP/SR programmes that are drawn from theory and from the authors' experience of developing and implementing SP/SR programmes over the last 20 years.(2)To understand the possible factors that guide the processes, content and structure of SP/SR programmes.(3)To understand how best to maximize effective engagement and learning (and limit harm) when planning or implementing an SP/SR programme.
Author(s): Freeston MH, Thwaites R, Bennett-Levy J
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Cognitive Behaviour Therapist
Online publication date: 29/04/2019
Acceptance date: 14/02/2019
ISSN (electronic): 1754-470X
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric