Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Potential Pharmacologic Targets for the Prevention of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Lookup NU author(s): Professor John IsaacsORCiD, Kundan Iqbal


Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


© 2019Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) immunopathology starts many years before clinical disease manifests. An early event is the breakdown in B-cell tolerance and the emergence of autoantibodies. Some years later, the autoantibody response matures, with epitope spreading and isotype switching suggesting more focused T-cell involvement. Circulating proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines appear concurrently, marking a phase of preclinical inflammation. Eventually individuals develop musculoskeletal symptoms and fatigue, heralding the imminent onset of synovitis. The prevention of RA can be aligned to these disease stages, which may simplistically be viewed as breach of tolerance, maturation of autoimmunity, and subclinical inflammation. At each stage, an “ethical” balance must be struck between the potential for benefit versus harm, in large part determined by the likelihood of progression to RA. In particular, tolerogenic interventions should be favored during asymptomatic disease, providing long-lasting, possibly lifelong, benefit from a short-term intervention. During the breach-of-tolerance phase, tolerogenic interventions might involve the administration of autoantigenic peptides in an attempt to shut down autoreactive B cells. The peptides may be “naked,” encapsulated in nanoparticles or loaded into autologous tolerogenic dendritic cells. It may also be possible to interfere with antigen generation and presentation, such as via peptidyl arginine deiminase inhibition. Attempts to interfere with B cells via depletion, differentiation, or intracellular signaling are also logical at this stage, if deemed sufficiently well tolerated. These interventions remain relevant during maturation of autoimmunity, but targeted T-cell interventions also become relevant, such as co-stimulation blockade and, potentially, interventions that target intracellular signaling pathways within T cells. Targeting of interleukin 23 during this phase may interfere with maturation of the autoantibody response by modulating autoantibody glycosylation, as well as by inhibiting T-helper 17 differentiation. During the phase of subclinical inflammation, targeting cytokines and chemokines could conceivably prevent progression to RA. Furthermore, tolerance induction is opposed by systemic inflammation and, during this phase, it may be necessary to consider therapeutic combinations of tolerogenic and antiinflammatory interventions.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Isaacs JD, Iqbal K

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Clinical Therapeutics

Year: 2019

Volume: 41

Issue: 7

Pages: 1312-1322

Print publication date: 01/07/2019

Online publication date: 10/06/2019

Acceptance date: 11/04/2019

ISSN (print): 0149-2918

ISSN (electronic): 1879-114X

Publisher: Elsevier


DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.04.020

PubMed id: 31196649


Altmetrics provided by Altmetric