Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Motivators and barriers to engagement with evidence-based practice among medical and dental trainees from the UK and Republic of Ireland: a national survey

Lookup NU author(s): Christin Henein



This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.OBJECTIVES: To explore the extent to which doctors and dentists in training within the UK and Republic of Ireland (RoI) engage in and with evidence-based practice (EBP), and to identify motivators and barriers to them doing so. DESIGN: An observational, prepiloted web-based survey developed by a trainee-led focus group. SETTING: The survey instrument was disseminated to doctors and dentists in training within the UK and RoI during June 2017 via social media and through deaneries, Royal Colleges and specialty-specific mailing lists. PARTICIPANTS: Data from 243 trainees were analysed; 188 doctors from 31 specialties and 55 dentists from 9 specialties. Responses were received from trainees at all stages of postgraduate training though the overall response rate was low. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The motivators and barriers to, and the extent of, trainee engagement with EBP. RESULTS: Cronbach's α was 0.83. Most trainees (87.6% (n=148) of doctors and 75.1% (n=39) of dentists) consulted the evidence base at least monthly, while 23.1% [n=39 doctors, 12 dentists] of both specialties did so daily. The two most commonly cited barriers to engagement with EBP for both doctors and dentists, respectively, were insufficient time (57.6% (n=95) and 45.1% (n=23)) and a tendency to follow departmental practice (40.6% (n=67) and 45.1% (n=23)). Key motivators for EBP included curiosity, following the example set by senior colleagues and a desire to avoid harm. Most trainees reported high levels of confidence interpreting evidence yet for 26.8% (n=45) of doctors and 36.5% (n=19) of dentists, medical hierarchy would impede them querying a colleague's management plan based on their own reading of the evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Time, accepted departmental practice and the behaviour of senior clinicians all highly impact on trainee engagement with EBP. Given the low response rate, the extent to which these data represent the overall population is unclear.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Hong B, O'Sullivan ED, Henein C, Jones CM

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: BMJ Open

Year: 2019

Volume: 9

Issue: 10

Print publication date: 17/10/2019

Online publication date: 17/10/2019

Acceptance date: 16/09/2019

Date deposited: 28/10/2019

ISSN (electronic): 2044-6055

Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group


DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031809

PubMed id: 31628131


Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funder referenceFunder name
203914/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust
Kidney Research UK
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Academic Clinical Fellowship (ACF) in Oral Surgery
NIHR ACF in Ophthalmolgy
NIHR ACF in Clinical Oncology