Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints - Test

Statistical design and analysis in trials of proportionate interventions: a systematic review

Lookup NU author(s): Jane Candlish, Professor Dawn Teare

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

© 2019 The Author(s).Background: In proportionate or adaptive interventions, the dose or intensity can be adjusted based on individual need at predefined decision stages during the delivery of the intervention. The development of such interventions may require an evaluation of the effectiveness of the individual stages in addition to the whole intervention. However, evaluating individual stages of an intervention has various challenges, particularly the statistical design and analysis. This review aimed to identify the use of trials of proportionate interventions and how they are being designed and analysed in current practice. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science and PsycINFO for articles published between 2010 and 2015 inclusive. We considered trials of proportionate interventions in all fields of research. For each trial, its aims, design and analysis were extracted. The data synthesis was conducted using summary statistics and a narrative format. Results: Our review identified 44 proportionate intervention trials, comprising 28 trial results, 13 protocols and three secondary analyses. These were mostly described as stepped care (n=37) and mainly focussed on mental health research (n=30). The other studies were aimed at finding an optimal adaptive treatment strategy (n=7) in a variety of therapeutic areas. Further terminology used included adaptive intervention, staged intervention, sequentially multiple assignment trial or a two-phase design. The median number of decision stages in the interventions was two and only one study explicitly evaluated the effect of the individual stages. Conclusions: Trials of proportionate staged interventions are being used predominantly within the mental health field. However, few studies consider the different stages of the interventions, either at the design or the analysis phase, and how they may interact with one another. There is a need for further guidance on the design, analyses and reporting across trials of proportionate interventions. Trial registration: Prospero, CRD42016033781. Registered on 2 February 2016.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Candlish J, Teare MD, Cohen J, Bywater T

Publication type: Review

Publication status: Published

Journal: Trials

Year: 2019

Volume: 20

Issue: 1

Online publication date: 28/02/2019

Acceptance date: 17/01/2019

ISSN (electronic): 1745-6215

Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.

URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3206-x

DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3206-x

PubMed id: 30819224


Actions

Find at Newcastle University icon    Link to this publication


Share