Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor David RoseORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).
There are two aims to the present paper. The first is to support the assertion that traditional justifications of revolution, rebellion and civil disobedience, though not wrong, are culturally inappropriate. The second is to outline, in the most basic of forms, what a “culturally appropriate” form of political resistance would require. The latter aim will be attempted by offering a counter-enlightenment model of resistance, derived in a large part from a Hegelian reading of Sartre's later work on groups, appropriate to the cultural conditions of late modernity.
Author(s): Rose DE
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: The Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence
Year: 2019
Volume: 3
Issue: 2
Pages: 148-167
Print publication date: 07/03/2020
Online publication date: 02/03/2020
Acceptance date: 01/01/2020
Date deposited: 06/03/2020
ISSN (print): 2559-9917
ISSN (electronic): 2559-9798
Publisher: Trivent
URL: https://trivent-publishing.eu/img/cms/9-%20David%20Edward%20Rose_OA.pdf
DOI: 10.22618/TP.PJCV.20204.1.201009
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric