Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Stephen Hughes
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Objectives: Health professional-led group programmes are a common form of long-term condition self-management support. Much research has focused on clinical outcomes of group participation, yet there is limited research on how group participants perceive and experience the support they receive. We aim to identify the different types of support that participants receive from both facilitators and other participants, and how they value this support.MethodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 participants taking part in a self-management group programme for a long-term condition (obesity, type 2 diabetes or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). Data pertaining to support types were deductively identified through a social support framework prior to interpretive thematic analysis.ResultsParticipants identified information and emotional support from both facilitators and other participants as complementary yet distinct. Facilitators’ support came from professional training and other participants’ support reflected the contextual, lived experience. Professional interactions were prioritised, constraining opportunities for participant–participant support to be received and exchanged.DiscussionWe identified a key gap in how self-management support is enacted in groups. Engaging participants to share experiential knowledge will make group support more relevant and mutually beneficial to participants living with a long-term condition.
Author(s): Hughes S, Lewis S, Willis K, Rogers A, Wyke S, Smith L
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Chronic Illness
Pages: Epub ahead of print
Online publication date: 19/08/2019
Acceptance date: 09/07/2019
ISSN (print): 1742-3953
ISSN (electronic): 1745-9206
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric