Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Comparing Proxy, Adolescent, and Adult Assessments of Functional Ability in Adolescents with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Helen Foster, Dr Flora McErlane

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

AbstractObjective In pediatric research, investigators rely on proxy reports of outcome, such as the proxy‐completed Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (C‐HAQ), to assess function in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). As children mature, they may self‐complete the adult HAQ or the unvalidated adolescent‐specific C‐HAQ. It is unclear how these measures compare and whether they are directly interchangeable. The present study was undertaken to compare agreement between the proxy‐completed C‐HAQ, adolescent‐specific C‐HAQ, and the HAQ at initial presentation to pediatric rheumatologic care and 1 year following the first presentation in adolescents with JIA. Methods Adolescents ages 11–17 years participating in the Childhood Arthritis Prospective Study (CAPS), a UK multicenter inception cohort, were included. In a CAPS substudy, adolescents self‐completed the adolescent‐specific C‐HAQ and the HAQ, and proxies simultaneously completed the proxy‐completed C‐HAQ at baseline and 1 year. Correlation and agreement between scores were assessed at baseline. Agreement and ability to similarly classify clinically important changes over time were assessed at 1 year following initial presentation to rheumatologic care. Results A total of 107 adolescents (adolescent‐specific C‐HAQ and HAQ) or their proxies (proxy‐completed C‐HAQ) had completed all 3 measures at baseline. Median age at diagnosis was 13 years, and 61% were female. Although the 3 scores demonstrated strong correlations (r > 0.8), they were not completely interchangeable, with agreement ranging between 70% and 80%. There was similar agreement between the changes in scores between baseline and 1 year. Using proxy‐completed C‐HAQ minimum clinically important cutoffs, the adolescent‐specific C‐HAQ and the HAQ similarly classified 80% to 90% of adolescents as having improved or worsened. Conclusion While there is relatively high agreement and similar classification of change between HAQ and the 2 C‐HAQ scores, these are not completely interchangeable. This impacts the comparison of function when measured in different ways over the lifespan.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Shoop-Worral SJW, Hyrich K, Verstappen SMM, Sergeant JC, Baildam E, Chieng A, Davidson J, Foster H, Ioannou Y, McErlane F, Wedderburn LR, Thomson W, McDonagh JE

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Arthritis Care and Research

Year: 2020

Volume: 72

Issue: 4

Pages: 517-524

Print publication date: 01/04/2020

Online publication date: 25/03/2020

Acceptance date: 15/03/2019

ISSN (print): 2151-464X

ISSN (electronic): 2151-4658

Publisher: Wiley

URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23877

DOI: 10.1002/acr.23877


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Actions

Find at Newcastle University icon    Link to this publication


Share