Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

On (Un)naturalness

Lookup NU author(s): Jan Deckers

Downloads


Licence

This is the authors' accepted manuscript of an article that has been published in its final definitive form by The White Horse Press , 2021.

For re-use rights please refer to the publisher's terms and conditions.


Abstract

Many scholars have argued that the distinction between the natural and the unnatural does not have any moral relevance, either because the distinction does not make sense or because, even if it does make sense, it does not make any moral sense. Before we can decide on the latter, we must therefore determine first whether a semantic distinction can be made. In this article, I argue that the distinction can be maintained. In spite of the fact that the categories of the natural and the unnatural are blurred as no unnatural things are completely unnatural, I argue that we can meaningfully distinguish between different types of unnaturalness along the natural-unnatural spectrum. To my knowledge, this article is the first publication to distinguish between three types of unnaturalness.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Deckers J

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Environmental Values

Year: 2021

Volume: 30

Issue: 3

Pages: 297-318

Print publication date: 01/06/2021

Online publication date: 16/11/2020

Acceptance date: 23/05/2020

Date deposited: 16/11/2020

ISSN (print): 0963-2719

ISSN (electronic): 1752-7015

Publisher: The White Horse Press

URL: https://doi.org/10.3197/096327120X16033868459494

DOI: 10.3197/096327120X16033868459494


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Actions

Find at Newcastle University icon    Link to this publication


Share