Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Andras BardossyORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
The widely applied geostatistical interpolation methods of ordinary kriging (OK) or external drift kriging (EDK) interpolate the variable of interest to the unknown location, providing a linear estimator and an estimation variance as measure of uncertainty. The methods implicitly pose the assumption of Gaussianity on the observations, which is not given for many variables. The resulting “best linear and unbiased estimator” from the subsequent interpolation optimizes the mean error over many realizations for the entire spatial domain and, therefore, allows a systematic under- (over-)estimation of the variable in regions of relatively high (low) observations. In case of a variable with observed time series, the spatial marginal distributions are estimated separately for one time step after the other, and the errors from the interpolations might accumulate over time in regions of relatively extreme observations. Therefore, we propose the interpolation method of quantile kriging (QK) with a two-step procedure prior to interpolation: we firstly estimate distributions of the variable over time at the observation locations and then estimate the marginal distributions over space for every given time step. For this purpose, a distribution function is selected and fitted to the observed time series at every observation location, thus converting the variable into quantiles and defining parameters. At a given time step, the quantiles from allobservation locations are then transformed into a Gaussian distributed variable by a 2-fold quantile–quantile transformation with the beta- and normal-distribution function. The spatio-temporal description of the proposed method accommodates skewed marginal distributions and resolves the spatial non-stationarity of the original variable. The Gaussian distributed variable and the distribution parameters are now interpolated by OK and EDK. At the unknown location, the resulting outcomes are reconverted back into the estimator and the estimation variance of the original variable. As a summary, QK newly incorporates information from the temporal axis for its spatial marginal distribution and subsequent interpolation and, therefore, could be interpreted as a space–time version of probability kriging. In this study, QK is applied for the variable of observed monthly precipitation from raingauges in South Africa. The estimators and estimation variances from the interpolation are compared to the respective outcomes from OK and EDK. The cross-validations show that QK improves the estimator and the estimation variance for most of the selected objectivefunctions. QK further enables the reduction of the temporal bias at locations of extreme observations. The performanceof QK, however, declines when many zero-value observations are present in the input data. It is further revealed thatQK relates the magnitude of its estimator with the magnitude of the respective estimation variance as opposed to the traditional methods of OK and EDK, whose estimation variances do only depend on the spatial configuration of the observation locations and the model settings.
Author(s): Lebrenz H, Bardossy A
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Hydrology and Earth System Science
Year: 2019
Volume: 23
Issue: 3
Pages: 1633-1648
Online publication date: 20/03/2019
Acceptance date: 05/03/2019
Date deposited: 17/02/2021
ISSN (print): 1027-5606
ISSN (electronic): 1607-7938
Publisher: Copernicus GmbH
URL: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1633-2019
DOI: 10.5194/hess-23-1633-2019
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
