Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Faye Williamson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Development of treatments for rare diseases is challenging due to the limited number of patients available for participation. Learning about treatment effectiveness with a view to treat patients in the larger outside population, as in the traditional fixed randomised design, may not be a plausible goal. An alternative goal is to treat the patients within the trial as effectively as possible. Using the framework of finite-horizon Markov decision processes and dynamic programming (DP), a novel randomised response-adaptive design is proposed which maximises the total number of patient successes in the trial and penalises if a minimum number of patients are not recruited to each treatment arm. Several performance measures of the proposed design are evaluated and compared to alternative designs through extensive simulation studies using a recently published trial as motivation. For simplicity, a two-armed trial with binary endpoints and immediate responses is considered. Simulation results for the proposed design show that: (i) the percentage of patients allocated to the superior arm is much higher than in the traditional fixed randomised design; (ii) relative to the optimal DP design, the power is largely improved upon and (iii) it exhibits only a very small bias and mean squared error of the treatment effect estimator. Furthermore, this design is fully randomised which is an advantage from a practical point of view because it protects the trial against various sources of bias. As such, the proposed design addresses some of the key issues that have been suggested as preventing so-called bandit models from being implemented in clinical practice.
Author(s): Williamson SF, Jacko P, Villar SS, Jaki T
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Computational Statistics and Data Analysis
Year: 2017
Volume: 113
Pages: 136-153
Print publication date: 01/09/2017
Online publication date: 28/09/2016
Acceptance date: 10/09/2016
Date deposited: 25/06/2021
ISSN (print): 0167-9473
ISSN (electronic): 1872-7352
Publisher: Elsevier BV
URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2016.09.006
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2016.09.006
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
