Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

COVID-19: Rapid antigen detection for SARS-CoV-2 by lateral flow assay: A national systematic evaluation of sensitivity and specificity for mass-testing

Lookup NU author(s): James Connolly, John Davis, David Green, Dr Cara Tomas-Smith, Dr Barbara Wilson, Fiona Yelnoorkar

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).


Abstract

© 2021 The Author(s)Background: Lateral flow device (LFD) viral antigen immunoassays have been developed around the world as diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 infection. They have been proposed to deliver an infrastructure-light, cost-economical solution giving results within half an hour. Methods: LFDs were initially reviewed by a Department of Health and Social Care team, part of the UK government, from which 64 were selected for further evaluation from 1st August to 15th December 2020. Standardised laboratory evaluations, and for those that met the published criteria, field testing in the Falcon-C19 research study and UK pilots were performed (UK COVID-19 testing centres, hospital, schools, armed forces). Findings: 4/64 LFDs so far have desirable performance characteristics (orient Gene, Deepblue, Abbott and Innova SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test). All these LFDs have a viral antigen detection of >90% at 100,000 RNA copies/ml. 8951 Innova LFD tests were performed with a kit failure rate of 5.6% (502/8951, 95% CI: 5.1–6.1), false positive rate of 0.32% (22/6954, 95% CI: 0.20–0.48). Viral antigen detection/sensitivity across the sampling cohort when performed by laboratory scientists was 78.8% (156/198, 95% CI 72.4–84.3). Interpretation: Our results suggest LFDs have promising performance characteristics for mass population testing and can be used to identify infectious positive individuals. The Innova LFD shows good viral antigen detection/sensitivity with excellent specificity, although kit failure rates and the impact of training are potential issues. These results support the expanded evaluation of LFDs, and assessment of greater access to testing on COVID-19 transmission. Funding: Department of Health and Social Care. University of Oxford. Public Health England Porton Down, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, National Institute of Health Research.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Peto T, Affron D, Afrough B, Agasu A, Ainsworth M, Allanson A, Allen K, Allen C, Archer L, Ashbridge N, Aurfan I, Avery M, Badenoch E, Bagga P, Balaji R, Baldwin E, Barraclough S, Beane C, Bell J, Benford T, Bird S, Bishop M, Bloss A, Body R, Boulton R, Bown A, Bratten C, Bridgeman C, Britton D, Brooks T, Broughton-Smith M, Brown P, Buck B, Butcher E, Byrne W, Calderon G, Campbell S, Carr O, Carter P, Carter D, Cathrall M, Catton M, Chadwick J, Chapman D, Chau KK, Chaudary T, Chidavaenzi S, Chilcott S, Choi B, Claasen H, Clark S, Clarke R, Clarke D, Clayton R, Collins K, Colston R, Connolly J, Cook E, Corcoran M, Corley B, Costello L, Coulson C, Crook A, Crook DW, D'Arcangelo S, Darby M-A, Davis J, de Koning R, Derbyshire P, Devall P, Dolman M, Draper N, Driver M, Dyas S, Eaton E, Edwards J, Elderfield R, Ellis K, Ellis G, Elwell S, Evans R, Evans B, Evans M, Evans R, Eyre D, Fahey C, Fenech V, Field J, Field A, Foord T, Fowler T, French M, Fuchs H, Gan J, Gernon J, Ghadiali G, Ghuman N, Gibbons K, Gill G, Gilmour K, Goel A, Gordon S, Graham T, Grassam-Rowe A, Green D, Gronert A, Gumsley-Read T, Hall C, Hallis B, Hammond S, Hammond P, Hanney B, Hardy V, Harker G, Harris A, Havinden-Williams M, Hazell E, Henry J, Hicklin K, Hollier K, Holloway B, Hoosdally SJ, Hopkins S, Hughes L, Hurdowar S, Hurford S-A, Jackman J, Jackson H, Johns R, Johnston S, Jones J, Kanyowa T, Keating-Fedders K, Kempson S, Khan I, Khulusi B, Knight T, Krishna A, Lahert P, Lampshire Z, Lasserson D, Lee K, Lee LYW, Legard A, Leggio C, Liu J, Lockett T, Logue C, Lucas V, Lumley SF, Maripuri V, Markham D, Marshall E, Matthews PC, Mckee S, McKee DF, McLeod N, McNulty A, Mellor F, Michel R, Mighiu A, Miller J, Mirza Z, Mistry H, Mitchell J, Moeser ME, Moore S, Muthuswamy A, Myers D, Nanson G, Newbury M, Nicol S, Nuttall H, Nwanaforo JJ, Oliver L, Osbourne W, Osbourne J, Otter A, Owen J, Panchalingam S, Papoulidis D, Pavon JD, Peace A, Pearson K, Peck L, Pegg A, Pegler S, Permain H, Perumal P, Peto L, Peto TEA, Pham T, Pickford HL, Pinkerton M, Platton M, Price A, Protheroe E, Purnell H, Rawden L, Read S, Reynard C, Ridge S, Ritter TG, Robinson J, Robinson P, Rodger G, Rowe C, Rowell B, Rowlands A, Sampson S, Saunders K, Sayers R, Sears J, Sedgewick R, Seeney L, Selassie A, Shail L, Shallcross J, Sheppard L, Sherkat A, Siddiqui S, Sienkiewicz A, Sinha L, Smith J, Smith E, Stanton E, Starkey T, Stawiarski A, Sterry A, Stevens J, Stockbridge M, Stoesser N, Sukumaran A, Sweed A, Tatar S, Thomas H, Tibbins C, Tiley S, Timmins J, Tomas-Smith C, Topping O, Turek E, Neibler T, Trigg-Hogarth K, Truelove E, Turnbull C, Tyrrell D, Vaughan A, Vertannes J, Vipond R, Wagstaff L, Waldron J, Walker P, Walker AS, Walters M, Wang JY, Watson E, Webberley K, Webster K, Westland G, Wickens I, Willcocks J, Willis H, Wilson S, Wilson B, Woodhead L, Wright D, Xavier B, Yelnoorkar F, Zeidan L, Zinyama R

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: EClinicalMedicine

Year: 2021

Pages: epub ahead of print

Online publication date: 29/05/2021

Acceptance date: 07/05/2021

Date deposited: 23/06/2021

ISSN (electronic): 2589-5370

Publisher: Lancet Publishing Group

URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100924

DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100924


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
Department of Health and Social Care
National Institute of Health Research.
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
Public Health England Porton Down
University of Oxford

Share