Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Angela Wearn
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Numerous studies have demonstrated the positive impact of mass media coverage of cancer on screening rates. In this online experiment, we assessed the influence of different types of mass media news articles (factual vs. emotive narratives) on cervical cancer screening intentions. We also tested the process through which mass media news articles influence screening intention. Participants (N = 141) were randomly allocated to receive either a news article containing factual information about screening, a news article containing an emotive narrative about a nonfamous woman who died after not being screened, or no information about screening. Participants, then, completed measures of stigma, fear, shame, and screening intention. Stigma toward people who had not been screened (i.e., public stigma) was greater when participants received an emotive narrative rather than factual information or no information. Moreover, we found a significant indirect effect of the manipulation on screening intention via public stigma. These results indicated that the emotive news article increased public stigma, which in turn predicted screening intention. Based on this, we argue that it is important to carefully consider the type of narrative that is included in mass media articles to ensure that it does not stigmatize people who have not been screened. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12659
Author(s): Wearn A, Shepherd L
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Print publication date: 01/05/2020
Online publication date: 28/02/2020
Acceptance date: 10/02/2020
ISSN (print): 0021-9029
ISSN (electronic): 1559-1816
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric