Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Nicola HallORCiD
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
© 2014 British Journal of General Practice. Background The challenge for GPs when assessing whether to refer a patient for cancer investigation is that many cancer symptoms are also caused by benign self-limiting illness. UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) referral guidelines emphasise that the patient should be involved in the decision-making process and be informed of the reasons for referral. Research to date, however, has not examined the extent to which these guidelines are borne out in practice.Aim To assess the degree to which patients are involved in the decision to be referred for investigation for symptoms associated with cancer and their understanding of the referral.Design and setting Qualitative interview study of patients referred to secondary care for symptoms suspicious of lung and colorectal cancer. Patients were recruited from two regions of England using maximum variation sampling.Method Transcribed interviews were analysed thematically.Results The analysis was based on 34 patient interviews. Patients in both symptom pathways reported little involvement in the decision to be referred for investigation. This tended to be accompanied by a patient expectation for referral, however, to explain ongoing and un-resolving symptoms. It was also found that reasons for referral tended to be couched in non-specific terms rather than cancer investigation, even when the patient was on a cancer-specific pathway.Conclusion GPs should consider a more overt discussion with patients when referring them for further investigation of symptoms suspicious of cancer. This would align clinical practice with NICE guidelines and encourage more open discussion between GPs and primary care patients around cancer.
Author(s): Banks J, Walter FM, Hall N, Mills K, Hamilton W, Turner KM
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: British Journal of General Practice
Year: 2014
Volume: 64
Issue: 629
Pages: e775-e782
Online publication date: 01/12/2014
Acceptance date: 25/08/2014
ISSN (print): 0960-1643
ISSN (electronic): 1478-5242
Publisher: Royal College of General Practitioners
URL: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X682849
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14X682849
PubMed id: 25452542
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
