Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Bayesian comparison of models for precision feeding and management in growing-finishing pigs

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Mac Misiura, Dr Joao Filipe, Professor Ilias Kyriazakis


Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


© 2021Precision feeding and management of growing-finishing pigs typically require mathematical models to forecast individual pig performance from past data. The current approaches, namely double exponential smoothing (DES) and dynamic linear regression are likely to have some limitations in their applicability since they: (1) assume that responses can be forecasted linearly, which only holds in the short-term, and (2) often take insufficient account of uncertainty and correlations in the estimated traits. We developed and evaluated alternative approaches to forecasting individual growth or intake responses based on nonlinear models (allometric, monomolecular, rational) and Bayesian methodology to fit models to the data and generate probabilistic forecasts. We applied these approaches to individual data from two distinct pig populations, to parameterise the models (fitting based on a training dataset) and forecast performance (forecast horizons: 1–30 d tested on a validation dataset). We found that good fitting did not guarantee accurate forecasting, which is quantitatively relevant in the medium-to-long term. Forecasts from nonlinear models were more accurate compared to those from benchmark linear models, with the allometric model being more accurate for most pigs across considered forecast horizons. While DES was the best model at fitting, it was also the least accurate at forecasting for all forecast horizons. These results enhance the understanding of how underlying biological growth responses could be approximated using straightforward mathematical relationships. The approach could be utilised to formulate optimised feeding strategies and inform management decisions, including pen allocation or end-weight prediction.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Misiura MM, Filipe JAN, Brossard L, Kyriazakis I

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Biosystems Engineering

Year: 2021

Volume: 211

Pages: 205-218

Print publication date: 01/11/2021

Online publication date: 28/09/2021

Acceptance date: 30/08/2021

ISSN (print): 1537-5110

ISSN (electronic): 1537-5129

Publisher: Academic Press


DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.08.027


Altmetrics provided by Altmetric