Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Elena Katselli
This is the authors' accepted manuscript of an article that has been published in its final definitive form by Brill, 2022.
For re-use rights please refer to the publisher's terms and conditions.
Preventing the forcibly displaced from returning to the territory from which they were unlawfully expelled has not received adequate attention under international criminal law. This article addresses this gap by focusing on denial of return as a crime against humanity. It evaluates international criminal jurisprudence including the proceedings concerning the Rohingya and evolving human rights standards to show that prevention from returning is a serious and continuing denial of fundamental human rights which inflicts great suffering. As such, it may qualify as persecution and/or an inhumane act under the Rome Statute. The ramifications of this on the temporal and territorial jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court and the principle of legality are important especially in situations of protracted displacement. The article demonstrates that although criminalisation of denial of return is not a panacea, it is instrumental in tackling forced displacement which affects millions across the world.
Author(s): Katselli Proukaki E
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: International Criminal Law Review
Year: 2022
Volume: 22
Pages: 401-437
Online publication date: 29/11/2021
Acceptance date: 27/10/2021
Date deposited: 27/10/2021
ISSN (print): 1567-536X
ISSN (electronic): 1571-8123
Publisher: Brill
URL: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-bja10118
DOI: 10.1163/15718123-bja10118
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric