Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Perspectives on domestic abuse prevention and early intervention using coalition building and ‘allyship’ approaches through a feminist lens

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Jessica Wild

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

This paper discusses a UK survivor-led study on domestic abuse prevention through coalition building between women and (non-perpetrating) men, and the sometimes-contested notion of ‘allyship’. Domestic abuse is constructed as a social problem for which there is a collective social responsibility, in which men are also attributed responsibility for preventing violence against women. With this in mind, women victimsurvivors’ perspectives and opinions regarding men’s participation in anti-violence against women work are discussed. Furthermore, in acknowledging that men could have a role in the sector, the study seeks to understand how far the challenges of obfuscation and co-optation associated with their participation can be overcome, particularly when operating within a feminist framework. This entails a complex negotiation of privilege and power, further complicated by the backdrop of UK austerity and an already constrained and hostile funding environment. Methods: Qualitative study using feminist, participatory based methods, engaging three participant groups; (i) women survivors, (ii) women ‘frontline’ practitioners, and (iii) ‘engaged’ men in the DV/A sector. A combination of in-depth, unstructured narrative interviews and focus groups were conducted separately with the three groups. Outcomes & Analysis: The intersections as well as the tensions across the three groups are examined, using a feminist, narrative and discourse analysis. Analysis reveals the complex landscape of deeply embedded gender relationships which pervade the anti-violence against women sector as well as societal response more generally to domestic abuse. Conclusions: The possibilities for a more nuanced approach to improved policy level decision making, as well as opportunities for survivor-led prevention incorporating a coalitional approach, require that the perspectives and lived experiences of victim-survivors are routinely foregrounded, and that a robust feminist ethos and praxis is maintained. This entails a nuanced understanding of the underpinning gender relations, as approaches to anti-violence against women work are diversified to include men.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Wild J

Publication type: Conference Proceedings (inc. Abstract)

Publication status: Published

Conference Name: 3rd European Conference on Domestic Violence

Year of Conference: 2019

Pages: 475-475

Acceptance date: 21/12/2018

Publisher: Norwegian Social Research (NOVA) at Oslo Metropolitan University

URL: https://az659834.vo.msecnd.net/eventsairwesteuprod/production-ccnorway-public/467858cb65b74791abdf0567702e8b6d


Share