Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Matthew Grainger, Dr Gavin StewartORCiD
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
© 2021 Elsevier B.V. The authors regret to inform readers of the following corrections required in the article. The affiliation of the authors should be as follows: Simone Pirasa, Simone Righib, Marco Settic, Nazli Koseoglua, Matthew J. Graingerd, Gavin B. Stewarte, Matteo Vittuaric aThe James Hutton Institute, Social, Economic & Geographical Sciences, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, Scotland, United Kingdom bDepartment of Economics, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Fondamenta S. Giobbe 873, 30121Venezia, Italy cDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Viale G. Fanin 50, 40137 Bologna, Italy dDepartment of Terrestrial Ecology, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, NO-7485 Trondheim, Norway eSchool of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Agriculture Building, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK At p. 6, at the end of the paragraph starting ‘In the simulations’, the sentence ‘provides an overview of the calibration parameters used in this first casestudyTable 3.’ should be ‘Table 3 provides an overview of the calibration parameters used in this first case study.’ At p. 6, at the end of the paragraph starting ‘Also for this second case study’, the sentence ‘provides an overview of the calibration parameters used in this second casestudyTable 5.’ should be ‘Table 5 provides an overview of the calibration parameters used in this second case study.’ At p. 7, the correct version of Fig. 1 (image and caption) is the one provided here. At p. 8, the correct version of Fig. 2 (image and caption) is the one provided here. At p. 9, at the end of the paragraph starting ‘To test the power of attraction of committed individuals’, the reference to Fig. 5 should be ignored. At page 9, footnote 18 should read as follows: ‘The results in Fig. 6 confirm these finding, being either symmetrical (left panel) or analogous (right panel) to the right panel of Fig. 5.’ At p. 10, the correct version of Fig. 3 (image and caption) is the one provided here. At p. 11, the correct version of Fig. 4 (image and caption) is the one provided here. At p. 12, the correct version of Fig. 5 (image and caption) is the one provided here. At p. 12, the correct version of Fig. 6 (image and caption) is the one provided here. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Author(s): Piras S, Righi S, Setti M, Koseoglu N, Grainger MJ, Stewart GB, Vittuari M
Publication type: Note
Publication status: Published
Journal: Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Year: 2022
Volume: 178
Print publication date: 01/03/2022
Online publication date: 08/11/2021
Acceptance date: 08/11/2021
ISSN (print): 0921-3449
ISSN (electronic): 1879-0658
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106019
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106019
