Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Sarah Coulthard
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
In the midst of a global fisheries crisis, there has been great interest in the fostering of adaptation and resilience in fisheries, as a means to reduce vulnerability and improve the capacity of fishing society to adapt to change. However, enhanced resilience does not automatically result in improved well-being of people, and adaptation strategies are riddled with difficult choices, or trade-offs, that people must negotiate. This paper uses the context of fisheries to explore some apparent tensions between adapting to change on the one hand, and the pursuit of well-being on the other, and illustrates that trade-offs can operate at different levels of scale. It argues that policies that seek to support fisheries resilience need to be built on a better understanding of the wide range of consequences that adaptation has on fisher well-being, the agency people exert in negotiating their adaptation strategies, and how this feeds back into the resilience of fisheries as a social-ecological system. The paper draws from theories on agency and adaptive preferences to illustrate how agency might be better incorporated into the resilience debate. Copyright © 2012 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance.
Author(s): Coulthard S
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Ecology and Society
Year: 2012
Volume: 17
Issue: 1
Print publication date: 01/01/2012
ISSN (electronic): 1708-3087
Publisher: Resilience Alliance
URL: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04483-170104
DOI: 10.5751/ES-04483-170104
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
