Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Dean PieridesORCiD
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Quantitative researchers often discuss research ethics as if specific ethical problems can be reduced to abstract normative logics (e.g., virtue ethics, utilitarianism, deontology). Such approaches overlook how values are embedded in every aspect of quantitative methods, including ‘observations,’ ‘facts,’ and notions of ‘objectivity.’ We describe how quantitative research practices, concepts, discourses, and their objects/subjects of study have always been value-laden, from the invention of statistics and probability in the 1600s to their subsequent adoption as a logic made to appear as if it exists prior to, and separate from, ethics and values. This logic, which was embraced in the Academy of Management from the 1960s, casts management researchers as ethical agents who ought to know about a reality conceptualized as naturally existing in the image of statistics and probability (replete with ‘constructs’), while overlooking that S&P logic and practices, which researchers made for themselves, have an appreciable role in making the world appear this way. We introduce a different way to conceptualize reality and ethics, wherein the process of scientific inquiry itself requires an examination of its own practices and commitments. Instead of resorting to decontextualized notions of ‘rigor’ and its ‘best practices,’ quantitative researchers can adopt more purposeful ways to reason about the ethics and relevance of their methods and their science. We end by considering implications for addressing ‘post truth’ and ‘alternative facts’ problems as collective concerns, wherein it is actually the pluralistic nature of description that makes defending a collectively valuable version of reality so important and urgent.
Author(s): Zyphur M, Pierides D
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Journal of Business Ethics
Year: 2020
Volume: 167
Issue: 1
Pages: 1-18
Print publication date: 30/11/2020
Online publication date: 29/05/2019
Acceptance date: 17/05/2019
ISSN (print): 0167-4544
ISSN (electronic): 1573-0697
Publisher: Springer
URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04187-8
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-019-04187-8
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
