Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Tanya Krupiy
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
The artificial intelligence capabilities of lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWSs) will revolutionize warfare. States have identified an imperative to create an accountability framework to address situations where use of a LAWS triggers an international crime. Indeed, the advent of LAWSs necessitates that we rethink how we attribute criminal accountability and how we understand traditional legal notions used for locating accountability. If the goals of international criminal law are to be promoted, the notion of moral agency should not be redefined to include LAWSs. Rather, there is a need for a distributed approach to accountability that ascribes responsibility to a senior political leader, a senior defense official responsible for promulgating policy on LAWSs, a weapon manufacturer, a weapon designer, a military commander, and an operator. The basis for this assertion is that a LAWS is in a matrix of relations with these individuals, meaning that they operate in an interdependent manner. These individuals are additionally in a matrix of relations with each other and their conduct is interconnected. The criteria for locating accountability should be whether the individual exercised authority in the circumstances over: (1) the LAWS either directly or through another person and (2) over the manner in which the LAWS was integrated with the operator. The context of LAWSs calls for a wider understanding of what constitutes an exercise of authority than the definition the doctrine of command responsibility encapsulates. The conclusion proposes a legal test for locating accountability for international crimes that arise from LAWSs.
Author(s): Krupiy T
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Georgetown Journal of International Law
Print publication date: 09/09/2018
Online publication date: 09/09/2018
Acceptance date: 01/10/2017
ISSN (print): 1550-5200
Publisher: Georgetown University Law Center