Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Tim Gray, Jenny Hatchard
The relationship between stakeholder participation (SP) and the ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management (EBAFM) is often taken for granted, but is actually very complicated. The literature reveals five possible interpretations of this relationship: that they are 1) logically linked; 2) ethically linked; 3) instrumentally linked; 4) complementarily linked; and 5) antagonistically linked. We examine these five formulations in the light of recent research on interactions between fisheries and their environment, on the basis of which we conclude that the SP/EBAFM relationship manifests itself as predominantly instrumental in character. Within this mutually beneficial, but uneven, relationship, ecosystem-based management benefits particularly from stakeholder participation in terms of knowledge; practical roles played by stakeholders; and added legitimacy. Complementary and ethical links between ecosystem-based management and stakeholder participation are less common but, respectively, command pragmatic and moral force. Logical links do exist, but mainly at the conceptual level, while there is very little evidence that SP and EBAFM are mutual antagonists
Author(s): Gray TS, Hatchard JL
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Marine Policy
Year: 2008
Volume: 32
Issue: 2
Pages: 158-168
Date deposited: 13/08/2010
ISSN (print): 0308-597X
ISSN (electronic): 1872-9460
Publisher: Elsevier
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2007.09.002
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2007.09.002
Notes: Tim Gray's contribution = 50%
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric