Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Kirstie Anderson, Dr Naomi Warren, Dr Duddy Duddy, Dr James Miller
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. It is increasingly common for secondary care to provide advice to primary care without an outpatient appointment. Even before the increased telemedicine during COVID-19, many hospital services gave advice alone for some referrals, yet there are few published data about patient outcomes. Does advice and guidance alter outpatient numbers or simply mean that patients are seen later? Which neurological conditions can we manage at a distance? Do complaints increase from either primary care or patients? Do clinics become more complex and time consuming? Our department has developed an advice and guidance service embedded within the English electronic referral system since 2017, allowing detailed analysis of the outcome of 6500 patients over 2.5 years. We suggest ways to set up and run a neurology advice and guidance service, looking at the potential benefits and the barriers.
Author(s): Anderson KN, Warren N, Duddy M, McKean P, Miller JAL
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Practical neurology
Year: 2022
Volume: 22
Issue: 3
Pages: 209-212
Print publication date: 01/06/2022
Online publication date: 24/01/2022
Acceptance date: 22/11/2021
Date deposited: 06/06/2022
ISSN (print): 1474-7758
ISSN (electronic): 1474-7766
Publisher: BMJ Group
URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/practneurol-2021-003100
DOI: 10.1136/practneurol-2021-003100
PubMed id: 35074798
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric