Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Comparison of day-case versus inpatient uni-compartmental knee replacement

Lookup NU author(s): Oday Al-Dadah

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Background: Uni-compartmental knee replacement (UKR) is an alternative to total knee replacement for patients who have isolated compartment osteoarthritis. Studies have demonstrated that UKR can be safely performed as a day-case procedure without a negative impact on complication rates. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes between day-case and inpatient UKRs. Methods: A single surgeon prospective case-controlled study was performed, comparing data between day-case UKRs and inpatient UKRs. This included longitudinal analysis of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs); including the Oxford Knee Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Short Form 12-item Health Survey, EQ-5D-5L and the Self-administered Comorbidity Questionnaire. Post-operative pain scores (visual analogue scale), unplanned post-operative hospital reattendance rates and complications were also analysed. Results: Overall, 100% of day-case patients were successfully discharged on the same day. Both inpatient (n = 23) and day-case (n = 23) UKRs demonstrated a significant within group longitudinal improvement of PROM scores (p < 0.05) following surgery. However, the post-operative PROM scores were significantly higher in the day-case group as compared to the inpatient group (p < 0.05). Both groups had comparable post-operative pain scores, but the day-case group demonstrated fewer unplanned reattendances and post-operative complications. Conclusion: The clinical outcomes of day-case UKR are superior to inpatient UKR. Careful patient selection and a robust multidisciplinary patient pathway are the key components to success of day-case joint replacement surgery. Level of evidence: Prospective Case-Control Study, level III.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Gao N-P, Al-Dadah O

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Musculoskeletal Care

Year: 2023

Volume: 21

Issue: 1

Pages: 16-24

Print publication date: 01/03/2023

Online publication date: 02/06/2022

Acceptance date: 19/05/2022

ISSN (print): 1478-2189

ISSN (electronic): 1557-0681

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Ltd

URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1662

DOI: 10.1002/msc.1662


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share