Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Identifying the top research priorities in medically not yet explained symptoms (MNYES): a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Petros PerrosORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. OBJECTIVES: This study establishes research priorities for medically not yet explained symptoms (MNYES), also known as persistent physical symptoms or medically unexplained symptoms, from the perspective of patients, caregivers and clinicians, in a priority setting partnership (PSP) following the James Lind Alliance (JLA) approach. Research into such symptoms in general has been poorly funded over the years and so far has been primarily researcher-led with minimal input from patients, caregivers and clinicians; and sometimes has been controversial. DESIGN: JLA PSP method. The PSP termed these symptoms MNYES. METHODS: The study was conducted according to the JLA's detailed methodology for conducting priority setting exercises. It involved five key stages: defining the appropriate term for the conditions under study by the PSP Steering Group; gathering questions on MNYES from patients, caregivers and clinicians in a publicly accessible survey; checking these research questions against existing evidence; interim prioritisation in a second survey; and a final multi-stakeholder consensus meeting to determine the top 10 unanswered research questions using the modified nominal group methodology. RESULTS: Over 700 responses from UK patients, caregivers and clinicians were identified in the two surveys and charities contributed from a broad range of medical specialties and primary care. The final top 10 unanswered research questions cover, among others: treatment strategies, personalisation of treatment, collaborative care pathways, training for clinicians and outcomes that matter to patients. INTERPRETATION: The top 10 unanswered research questions are expected to generate much needed, relevant and impactful research into MNYES.


Publication metadata

Author(s): van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Sweetman J, Edwards M, Gall N, Gilligan J, Hayle S, Kaul A, Moriarty AS, Perros P, Sampford J, Smith N, Elfeddali I, Varley D, Gower J

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: BMJ open

Year: 2022

Volume: 12

Issue: 7

Online publication date: 01/07/2022

Acceptance date: 14/06/2022

Date deposited: 28/07/2022

ISSN (electronic): 2044-6055

Publisher: B M J Group

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061263

DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061263

PubMed id: 35777869


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
Wellcome Trust [Grant number 204829] from the overall Wellcome Trust ISSF award through the Centre for Future Health (CFH) at the University of York

Share