Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Dorothy Coe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Background: In early 2020, little was known about treatments for COVID-19. The UK responded by initiating a call for research, leading to the formation of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Urgent Public Health (UPH) group. Fast-track approvals were initiated and support was offered to research sites via the NIHR. The Randomised Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy (RECOVERY) trial was designated UPH. High recruitment rates were required for timely results. Recruitment rates were inconsistent across different hospitals and places. Purpose: The Factors Affecting Recruitment to the RECOVERY trial study was designed to seek out the facilitators and barriers to recruitment across a population of 3 million served by eight different hospitals and suggest recommendations for recruitment to UPH research during a pandemic situation. Methods: A qualitative grounded theory study using situational analysis was used. This included a contextualisation of each recruitment site containing prepandemic operational status, prior research activity, COVID-19 admission rates and UPH activity. Additionally, one-to-one interviews using topic guides were completed with NHS staff involved in the RECOVERY trial. Analysis sought out the narratives that shaped recruitment activity. Results: An ideal recruitment situation was identified. The closer sites were able to move towards that ideal situation, the easier they found it to implement the most significant factor on recruitment: embedding research recruitment into standard care. The ability to move to the ideal recruitment situation was mediated by five significant elements: uncertainty, prioritisation, leadership, engagement and communication. Conclusion: Embedding recruitment into routine clinical care was the most influential factor on recruitment to the RECOVERY trial. To enable this, sites needed to attain the ideal recruitment situation. Prior research activity, size of site and regulator grading did not correlate with high recruitment rates. Research should be at the forefront of prioritisation during future pandemics.
Author(s): Coe D, Dorgan S, Smith J, Wroe C
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: BMJ Leader
Year: 2023
Volume: 7
Issue: 2
Pages: 108-116
Online publication date: 23/10/2022
Acceptance date: 27/09/2022
Date deposited: 12/04/2024
ISSN (electronic): 2398-631X
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2021-000566
DOI: 10.1136/leader-2021-000566
Data Access Statement: Data are available upon reasonable request. Data are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
