Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

A critical appraisal of controlled studies investigating malformation risks following pregabalin use in early pregnancy

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Amanda Greenall, Sally Stephens, Dr Kenneth Hodson

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

© 2022 British Pharmacological Society. In March 2022, the Summary of Product Characteristics for the Lyrica brand of pregabalin was updated with warnings regarding malformation risks. This literature review and critical appraisal aims to explore whether these Summary of Product Characteristics updates are justified and provide clarity on the risk–benefit balance for pregabalin use in early pregnancy. A literature review was conducted in May 2022 to identify English language comparative studies of any design providing data about first trimester maternal pregabalin use and malformation risk. Five observational comparative cohort studies using data from 9 distinct datasets were located. Collectively these studies described at least 5300 unique pregabalin exposed pregnancies, with 4900 exposed in at least the first trimester. Three studies investigated overall major malformation risks, and 4 investigated specific malformation risks. The available evidence was found to be conflicting and generally of low quality, probably influenced by bias and data confounding, with no clear pattern of specific malformations observed. Findings from the largest study suggested absolute risks of major malformation of 4.8–5.6%, relative to a background risk of approximately 4%. Due to study methodology limitations, the available data were judged to only provide low quality evidence suggestive of a possible and unconfirmed small increased risk that cannot be solely attributed to foetal pregabalin exposure. This literature review and critical appraisal indicates that the Lyrica product literature updates are insufficiently substantiated and could result in confusion and misinformed clinical risk–benefit decision making.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Richardson JL, Damkier P, Diav-Citrin O, George N, Greenall AJ, Oliver AM, Stephens S, Hodson KK

Publication type: Review

Publication status: Published

Journal: British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Year: 2023

Volume: 89

Issue: 2

Pages: 630-640

Print publication date: 01/02/2023

Online publication date: 20/11/2022

Acceptance date: 09/11/2022

ISSN (print): 0306-5251

ISSN (electronic): 1365-2125

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc

URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15607

DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15607

PubMed id: 36403130


Share