Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Venkatesh Kanakala
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Background: The prediction of a difficult cholecystectomy has traditionally been based on certain pre-operative clinical and imaging factors. Most of the previous literature reported small patient cohorts and have not used an objective measure of operative difficulty. The aim of this study was to develop a pre-operative score to predict difficult cholecystectomy, as defined by a validated intra-operative difficulty grading scale. Method: Two cohorts from prospectively maintained databases of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were analysed: the CholeS Study (8755 patients) and a single surgeon series (4089 patients). Factors potentially predictive of difficulty were correlated to the Nassar intra-operative difficulty scale. A multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was then used to identify factors that were independently associated with difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy, defined as operative difficulty grades 3 to 5. The resulting model was then converted to a risk score, and validated on both internal and external datasets. Result: Increasing age and ASA classification, male gender, diagnosis of CBD stone or cholecystitis, thick-walled gallbladders, CBD dilation, use of pre-operative ERCP and non-elective operations were found to be significant independent predictors of difficult cases. A risk score based on these factors returned an area under the ROC curve of 0.789 (95% CI 0.773–0.806, p < 0.001) on external validation, with 11.0% versus 80.0% of patients classified as low versus high risk having difficult surgeries. Conclusion: We have developed and validated a pre-operative scoring system that uses easily available pre-operative variables to predict difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies. This scoring system should assist in patient selection for day case surgery, optimising pre-operative surgical planning (e.g. allocation of the procedure to a suitably trained surgeon) and counselling patients during the consent process. The score could also be used to risk adjust outcomes in future research.
Author(s): Nassar AHM, Hodson J, Ng HJ, Vohra RS, Katbeh T, Zino S, Griffiths EA, Kanakala V, CholeS Study Group
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Surgical Endoscopy
Year: 2020
Volume: 34
Issue: 10
Pages: 4549-4561
Print publication date: 01/10/2020
Online publication date: 15/11/2019
Acceptance date: 28/10/2019
ISSN (print): 0930-2794
ISSN (electronic): 1432-2218
Publisher: Springer Nature
URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07244-5
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07244-5
PubMed id: 31732855
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
