Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Interpreting genetic variants in titin in patients with muscle disorders

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Giorgio TascaORCiD


Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


© 2018 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.IMPORTANCE Mutations in the titin gene (TTN) cause a wide spectrum of genetic diseases. The interpretation of the numerous rare variants identified in TTN is a difficult challenge given its large size. OBJECTIVE To identify genetic variants in titin in a cohort of patients with muscle disorders. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this case series, 9 patients with titinopathy and 4 other patients with possibly disease-causing variants in TTN were identified. Titin mutations were detected through targeted resequencing performed on DNA from 504 patients with muscular dystrophy, congenitalmyopathy, or other skeletal muscle disorders. Patients were enrolled from 10 clinical centers in April 2012 to December 2013. All of them had not received a diagnosis after undergoing an extensive investigation, including Sanger sequencing of candidate genes. The data analysis was performed between September 2013 and January 2017. Sequencing data were analyzed using an internal custom bioinformatics pipeline. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The identification of novel mutations in the TTN gene and novel patients with titinopathy.We performed an evaluation of putative causative variants in the TTN gene, combining genetic, clinical, and imaging data with messenger RNA and/or protein studies. RESULTS Of the 9 novel patients with titinopathy, 5 (55.5%) were men and the mean (SD) age at onset was 25 (15.8) years (range, 0-46 years). Of the 4 other patients (3 men and 1 woman) with possibly disease-causing TTN variants, 2 (50%) had a congenitalmyopathy and 2 (50%) had a slowly progressive distalmyopathy with onset in the second decade. Most of the identified mutations were previously unreported. However, all the variants, even the already described mutations, require careful clinical and molecular evaluation of probands and relatives. Heterozygous truncating variants or unique missense changes are not sufficient to make a diagnosis of titinopathy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The interpretation of TTN variants often requires further analyses, including a comprehensive evaluation of the clinical phenotype (deep phenotyping) as well as messenger RNA and protein studies.We propose a specific workflow for the clinical interpretation of genetic findings in titin.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Savarese M, Maggi L, Vihola A, Jonson PH, Tasca G, Ruggiero L, Bello L, Magri F, Giugliano T, Torella A, Evila A, Di Fruscio G, Vanakker O, Gibertini S, Vercelli L, Ruggieri A, Antozzi C, Luque H, Janssens S, Pasanisi MB, Fiorillo C, Raimondi M, Ergoli M, Politano L, Bruno C, Rubegni A, Pane M, Santorelli FM, Minetti C, Angelini C, De Bleecker J, Moggio M, Mongini T, Comi GP, Santoro L, Mercuri E, Pegoraro E, Mora M, Hackman P, Udd B, Nigro V

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: JAMA Neurology

Year: 2018

Volume: 75

Issue: 5

Pages: 557-565

Online publication date: 12/02/2018

Acceptance date: 16/08/2017

ISSN (print): 2168-6149

ISSN (electronic): 2168-6157

Publisher: American Medical Association


DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.4899

PubMed id: 29435569


Altmetrics provided by Altmetric