Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

A six-step process to explore facial expressions performances to detect pain in dairy cows with lipopolysaccharide-induced clinical mastitis

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Matthew Leach

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).


Abstract

This study aimed to explore the performances of Facial Action Units (FAUs) to detect pain in cows under lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge though a six-step process based on expression, selectivity (construct validity, responsiveness), intra- and inter-observer reliability, and measurement error (specificity, Sp; sensitivity, Se). Twenty-seven cows received an intra-mammary infusion of 25 μg E. coli LPS in one healthy udder quarter. Then, 14 cows received a placebo (LPS cows) and 13 cows received 3 mg/kg BW ketoprofen i.m. (LPS+NSAID cows). Each cow’s face was video-recorded for 40 s at three time points before (T-21 = 11:30 h, T-19 = 13:30 h, T-16 = 16:30 h) and after (T3 = 11:30 h, T5 = 13:30 h, T8 = 16:30 h) infusion. Three trained observers scored the duration, frequency or presence/absence of 43 FAUs on 40 second video segments. We kept only the selective FAUs (construct validity) and transformed them into binary variables (below / above a threshold determined by ROC curves and Youden index). Intra- and inter-observer reliability were assessed by percentage of agreement (PA) and Fleiss’ kappa (k). We calculated Sp and Se. The process therefore consisted in a waterfall method with expression, selectivity, intra-observer reliability being an eliminative step, while inter-observer reliability, Sp and Se were not. FAUs were kept if expressed (>5% of the videos), and kept for intra-observer reliability if PA≥ 75% and k ≥ 0.41. Two too rarely expressed FAUs were excluded. LPS infusion induced changes in 7 FAUs of orbital, auricular, and mouth-and-muzzle regions. Compared to before challenge (T-19), at T5, LPS cows spent signifi- cantly less time with ‘muzzle in motion’ (P = 0.045), tended to display more ‘nostril dilation’ (P = 0.097), spend more time with ‘motionless muzzle’ (P = 0.068) and less time in ‘ear: position 8′ (i.e. backwards /central/pinna to the side) (P = 0.057). At T8, LPS cows spent significantly less time with ‘eye open’ (P = 0.036) and tended to less frequently display ‘eye blinking’ (P = 0.071) and ‘eye movements’ (P = 0.091) compared to T-16. Four of these 7 FAUs (‘eye open’, ‘motionless muzzle’, ‘muzzle in motion’, ‘nostril dilatation’) satisfied all following steps of the process except sensitivity. Two other FAUs (‘eye blinking’, ‘eye movements’) satisfied intra- and inter- observer reliability; depending on the time point considered they were either sensitive or specific but not both simultaneously. The last FAU (‘ear: position 8′) satisfied intra-observer reliability and sensitivity but not inter-observer reliability nor specificity. This study identified 7 FAUs as potential candidate for detecting mild pain associated with induced inflammatory mastitis in dairy cows.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Ginger L, Aube L, Ledoux D, Borot M, David C, Bouchond M, Leach M, Durand D, de Boyer des Roches A

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Year: 2023

Volume: 264

Print publication date: 01/07/2023

Online publication date: 12/05/2023

Acceptance date: 11/05/2023

Date deposited: 14/06/2023

ISSN (print): 0168-1591

ISSN (electronic): 1872-9045

Publisher: Elsevier BV

URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2023.105951

DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2023.105951


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share