Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Kay CrosbyORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).
There has, for centuries, been an interest in various jurisdictions concerning the phenomenon that is variously described as jury nullification, perverse verdicts, and so on. Essentially, of jurors not applying the law as it is set out to them by the trial judge. More recently, the phenomenon of the unrepresented defendant, and of decisions such as Dobbs undermining longstanding constitutional protections, has raised the question of whether an appeal to nullification might form a legitimate legal tactic in a trial. This chapter offers the first comparative discussion of the doctrine on the parties themselves requesting nullification from their juries.
Author(s): Crosby K
Editor(s): Monaghan, N
Publication type: Book Chapter
Publication status: Published
Book Title: Challenges in the Jury System: UK Juries in Comparative Perspective
Year: 2025
Pages: 27-44
Print publication date: 05/07/2024
Online publication date: 05/07/2024
Acceptance date: 05/06/2023
Publisher: Routledge
Place Published: London and New York
URL: https://www.routledge.com/Contemporary-Challenges-in-the-Jury-System-A-Comparative-Perspective/Monaghan/p/book/9781032506531
ePrints DOI: 10.57711/3yst-4d74
Library holdings: Search Newcastle University Library for this item
ISBN: 9781032506531