Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

When the Parties Call for Jury Nullification: a comparative analysis

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Kay CrosbyORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).


Abstract

There has, for centuries, been an interest in various jurisdictions concerning the phenomenon that is variously described as jury nullification, perverse verdicts, and so on. Essentially, of jurors not applying the law as it is set out to them by the trial judge. More recently, the phenomenon of the unrepresented defendant, and of decisions such as Dobbs undermining longstanding constitutional protections, has raised the question of whether an appeal to nullification might form a legitimate legal tactic in a trial. This chapter offers the first comparative discussion of the doctrine on the parties themselves requesting nullification from their juries.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Crosby K

Editor(s): Monaghan, N

Publication type: Book Chapter

Publication status: Published

Book Title: Challenges in the Jury System: UK Juries in Comparative Perspective

Year: 2025

Pages: 27-44

Print publication date: 05/07/2024

Online publication date: 05/07/2024

Acceptance date: 05/06/2023

Publisher: Routledge

Place Published: London and New York

URL: https://www.routledge.com/Contemporary-Challenges-in-the-Jury-System-A-Comparative-Perspective/Monaghan/p/book/9781032506531

ePrints DOI: 10.57711/3yst-4d74

Library holdings: Search Newcastle University Library for this item

ISBN: 9781032506531


Share