Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Sunil BhopalORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Copyright © 2023 Kirkwood, Sikander, Roy, Soremekun, Bhopal, Avan, Lingam, Gram, Amenga-Etego, Khan, Aziz, Kumar, Verma, Sharma, Panchal, Zafar, Skordis, Batura, Hafeez, Hill, Divan and Rahman.Introduction: Almost 250 million children fail to achieve their full growth or developmental potential, trapping them in a cycle of continuing disadvantage. Strong evidence exists that parent-focussed face to face interventions can improve developmental outcomes; the challenge is delivering these on a wide scale. SPRING (Sustainable Programme Incorporating Nutrition and Games) aimed to address this by developing a feasible affordable programme of monthly home visits by community-based workers (CWs) and testing two different delivery models at scale in a programmatic setting. In Pakistan, SPRING was embedded into existing monthly home visits of Lady Health Workers (LHWs). In India, it was delivered by a civil society/non-governmental organisation (CSO/NGO) that trained a new cadre of CWs. Methods: The SPRING interventions were evaluated through parallel cluster randomised trials. In Pakistan, clusters were 20 Union Councils (UCs), and in India, the catchment areas of 24 health sub-centres. Trial participants were mother-baby dyads of live born babies recruited through surveillance systems of 2 monthly home visits. Primary outcomes were BSID-III composite scores for psychomotor, cognitive and language development plus height for age z-score (HAZ), assessed at 18 months of age. Analyses were by intention to treat. Results: 1,443 children in India were assessed at age 18 months and 1,016 in Pakistan. There was no impact in either setting on ECD outcomes or growth. The percentage of children in the SPRING intervention group who were receiving diets at 12 months of age that met the WHO minimum acceptable criteria was 35% higher in India (95% CI: 4–75%, p = 0.023) and 45% higher in Pakistan (95% CI: 15–83%, p = 0.002) compared to children in the control groups. Discussion: The lack of impact is explained by shortcomings in implementation factors. Important lessons were learnt. Integrating additional tasks into the already overloaded workload of CWs is unlikely to be successful without additional resources and re-organisation of their goals to include the new tasks. The NGO model is the most likely for scale-up as few countries have established infrastructures like the LHW programme. It will require careful attention to the establishment of strong administrative and management systems to support its implementation.
Author(s): Kirkwood BR, Sikander S, Roy R, Soremekun S, Bhopal SS, Avan B, Lingam R, Gram L, Amenga-Etego S, Khan B, Aziz S, Kumar D, Verma D, Sharma KK, Panchal SN, Zafar S, Skordis J, Batura N, Hafeez A, Hill Z, Divan G, Rahman A
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Frontiers in Nutrition
Year: 2023
Volume: 10
Online publication date: 19/06/2023
Acceptance date: 05/04/2023
Date deposited: 03/08/2023
ISSN (electronic): 2296-861X
Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1155763
DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1155763
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
