Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Tom Lane
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
In ordinary life, many types of situation occur in which a better-informed agent faces a decision over whether to reveal some bad news to an uninformed counterpart. This paper reports an experiment designed to explore how, in such contexts, the decisions of informed individuals are shaped by intrinsic preferences over information. Impartial spectators are tasked with deciding whether to make initially uninformed subjects aware that their actions have inadvertently generated negative externalities. Knowledge of this consequence is materially useless and reduces the subjective happiness of the externality-generating subjects, as is anticipated by the vast majority of spectators. However, 72% of spectators still choose to reveal the information. This suggests the existence of intrinsic preferences for information possession which are not based on hedonic considerations and indeed are sufficiently strong as to trump spectators’ concerns about the negative hedonic consequences of revelation. However, the hedonic impact of information is not completely overlooked, as spectators are less likely to reveal information the more strongly they believe it will damage the recipient's happiness.
Author(s): Lane T
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
Year: 2022
Volume: 202
Pages: 119-130
Print publication date: 01/10/2022
Acceptance date: 01/08/2022
ISSN (print): 0167-2681
ISSN (electronic): 1879-1751
Publisher: Elsevier
URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.08.006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.08.006
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric