Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Qualitative evaluation of a complex mental health intervention in general practices serving socioeconomically disadvantaged communities in northern England

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Jayne JeffriesORCiD, Dr Angela Wearn, Dr Sarah SowdenORCiD

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

Background ‘Deep End’ primary care is a network of general practices serving communities facing extreme socioeconomic disadvantage. In the ‘Deep End’ there are high levels of patient mental ill-health support needs. Previous co-design research with professionals working in Deep End Primary Care has identified key priorities for them around better supporting patients’ mental health and dealing with relentlessly high numbers of patients with multiple and complex needs, against a backdrop of severe challenges in workforce recruitment and retention. MINDED (Mental Health In the Deep End) is a qualitative evaluation aiming to understand the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a complex intervention to embed a GP-based psychology team in ‘Deep End’ primary care within Northern England.Methods Case studies of three models of service delivery in GP practices were explored using qualitative interviews with professional staff in clinical and non-clinical roles. NHS Research Ethics Committee-approved topic guides examined the context of each pilot; phases of recruitment, training, supporting and embedding new staff; and the organisational changes involved in expanding workforce provision. Audio-recorded, online interviews were transcribed verbatim, and then analysed using thematic analysis, including deductive codes derived from topic guides, and iterative codes emerging from data collection.Results The pilot was implemented in six ‘Deep End’ general practices. Thirty semi-structured interviews were conducted with professionals working in these practices (GPs, nurse practitioners, practice managers and support staff, mental health therapists, practitioners, clinical psychologists, pharmacists and social prescribing link workers). The interviews revealed the varying context of each practice, from the number of registered patients, daily administrative tasks and responsibilities (triage and booking systems), and variation in new mental health roles implemented (career stage, experience, expertise). Complexities around recruitment necessitated pursuing a range of funding streams and employment arrangements (general practice direct employment and secondment of mental health specialists from Secondary Care Trusts).The evaluation captured key learning in respect of the hopes, expectations, barriers and bumps to integrating new in-house psychology services in Primary Care. The results are grounded in the data and show that complex interventions evolve and unfold over time, yet this context also elevates the importance of documenting the shifting landscape and demonstrating how pilot studies translates in to practice.Conclusion The complexities uncovered through this research will inform service transformation and act as a guide to other areas wishing to implement similar interventions and address socioeconomic inequalities in health and care.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Jeffries J, Wearn A, Hassan S, Chew-Graham C, Sowden S

Publication type: Conference Proceedings (inc. Abstract)

Publication status: Published

Conference Name: Society for Social Medicine & Population Health Annual Scientific Meeting

Year of Conference: 2023

Pages: A13

Print publication date: 24/08/2023

Acceptance date: 24/08/2023

Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group

URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2023-SSMabstracts.25

DOI: 10.1136/jech-2023-SSMabstracts.25

Series Title: Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health


Share