Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Study of Oesophageal Injuries and Related Clinical Outcomes (MUSOIC study)

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Alexander PhillipsORCiD

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. OBJECTIVE: To identify prognostic factors associated with 90-day mortality in patients with oesophageal perforation (OP), and characterize the specific timeline from presentation to intervention, and its relation to mortality. BACKGROUND: OP is a rare gastro-intestinal surgical emergency with a high mortality rate. However, there is no updated evidence on its outcomes in the context of centralized esophago-gastric services; updated consensus guidelines; and novel non-surgical treatment strategies. METHODS: A multi-center, prospective cohort study involving eight high-volume esophago-gastric centers (January 2016 to December 2020) was undertaken. The primary outcome measure was 90-day mortality. Secondary measures included length of hospital and ICU stay, and complications requiring re-intervention or re-admission. Mortality model training was performed using random forest, support-vector machines, and logistic regression with and without elastic net regularisation. Chronological analysis was performed by examining each patient's journey timepoint with reference to symptom onset. RESULTS: The mortality rate for 369 patients included was 18.9%. Patients treated conservatively, endoscopically, surgically, or combined approaches had mortality rates of 24.1%, 23.7%, 8.7%, and 18.2%, respectively. The predictive variables for mortality were Charlson comorbidity index, haemoglobin count, leucocyte count, creatinine levels, cause of perforation, presence of cancer, hospital transfer, CT findings, whether a contrast swallow was performed, and intervention type. Stepwise interval model showed that time to diagnosis was the most significant contributor to mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Non-surgical strategies have better outcomes and may be preferred in selected cohorts to manage perforations. Outcomes can be significantly improved through better risk-stratification based on afore-mentioned modifiable risk factors.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Owen RP, Chidambaram S, Griffiths EA, Sultan J, Phillips AW, Vohra R, Preston S, Gossage J, Hanna GB, Underwood TJ, Maynard N, Markar SR

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Annals of Surgery

Year: 2023

Volume: 278

Issue: 6

Pages: 910-917

Print publication date: 01/12/2023

Acceptance date: 02/04/2018

ISSN (print): 0003-4932

ISSN (electronic): 1528-1140

Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

URL: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005889

DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005889

PubMed id: 37114497


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share