Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Katie Bounsall, Madison Milne-Ives, Professor Camille CarrollORCiD, Professor Edward MeinertORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
© 2023 The authors.Background: Parkinson disease (PD) is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disease, with around 10 million people with PD worldwide. Current assessments of PD symptoms are conducted by questionnaires and clinician assessments and have many limitations, including unreliable reporting of symptoms, little autonomy for patients over their disease management, and standard clinical review intervals regardless of disease status or clinical need. To address these limitations, digital technologies including wearable sensors, smartphone apps, and artificial intelligence (AI) methods have been implemented for this population. Many reviews have explored the use of AI in the diagnosis of PD and management of specific symptoms; however, there is limited research on the application of AI to the monitoring and management of the range of PD symptoms. A comprehensive review of the application of AI methods is necessary to address the gap of high-quality reviews and highlight the developments of the use of AI within PD care. Objective: The purpose of this protocol is to guide a systematic review to identify and summarize the current applications of AI applied to the assessment, monitoring, and management of PD symptoms. Methods: This review protocol was structured using the PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols) and the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, and Study (PICOS) frameworks. The following 5 databases will be systematically searched: PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Institute for Scientific Information’s Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Title and abstract screening, full-text review, and data extraction will be conducted by 2 independent reviewers. Data will be extracted into a predetermined form, and any disagreements in screening or extraction will be discussed. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomized trials and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for nonrandomized trials. Results: As of April 2023, this systematic review has not yet been started. It is expected to begin in May 2023, with the aim to complete by September 2023. Conclusions: The systematic review subsequently conducted as a product of this protocol will provide an overview of the AI methods being used for the assessment, monitoring, and management of PD symptoms. This will identify areas for further research in which AI methods can be applied to the assessment or management of PD symptoms and could support the future implementation of AI-based tools for the effective management of PD.
Author(s): Bounsall K, Milne-Ives M, Hall A, Carroll C, Meinert E
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: JMIR Research Protocols
Year: 2023
Volume: 12
Online publication date: 14/06/2023
Acceptance date: 04/04/2023
Date deposited: 30/01/2024
ISSN (electronic): 1929-0748
Publisher: JMIR Publications Inc.
URL: https://doi.org/10.2196/46581
DOI: 10.2196/46581
Data Access Statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no data sets were generated or analyzed during this study. Data sets generated and analyzed from the prospective full review will be available from the corresponding author upon request.
PubMed id: 37314853
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
