Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Blood pressure and risk of venous thromboembolism: a cohort analysis of 5.5 million UK adults and Mendelian randomization studies

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Dexter CanoyORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. Aims Evidence for the effect of elevated blood pressure (BP) on the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been conflicting. We sought to assess the association between systolic BP and the risk of VTE. Methods and results Three complementary studies comprising an observational cohort analysis, a one-sample and two-sample Mendelian randomization were conducted using data from 5 588 280 patients registered in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) dataset and 432 173 UK Biobank participants with valid genetic data. Summary statistics of International Network on Venous Thrombosis genome-wide association meta-analysis was used for two-sample Mendelian randomization. The primary outcome was the first occurrence of VTE event, identified from hospital discharge reports, death registers, and/or primary care records. In the CPRD cohort, 104 017(1.9%) patients had a first diagnosis of VTE during the 9.6-year follow-up. Each 20 mmHg increase in systolic BP was associated with a 7% lower risk of VTE [hazard ratio: 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI): (0.92–0.94)]. Statistically significant interactions were found for sex and body mass index, but not for age and subtype of VTE (pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis). Mendelian randomization studies provided strong evidence for the association between systolic BP and VTE, both in the one-sample [odds ratio (OR): 0.69, (95% CI: 0.57–0.83)] and two-sample analyses [OR: 0.80, 95% CI: (0.70–0.92)]. Conclusion We found an increased risk of VTE with lower BP, and this association was independently confirmed in two Mendelian randomization analyses. The benefits of BP reduction are likely to outweigh the harms in most patient groups, but in people with predisposing factors for VTE, further BP reduction should be made cautiously.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Nazarzadeh M, Bidel Z, Mohseni H, Canoy D, Pinho-Gomes A-C, Hassaine A, Dehghan A, Tregouet D-A, Smith NL, Rahimi K

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Cardiovascular Research

Year: 2023

Volume: 119

Issue: 3

Pages: 835-842

Print publication date: 01/03/2023

Online publication date: 29/08/2022

Acceptance date: 26/07/2022

Date deposited: 01/03/2024

ISSN (print): 0008-6363

ISSN (electronic): 1755-3245

Publisher: Oxford University Press

URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvac135

DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvac135

Data Access Statement: Data can be obtained directly from CPRD subject to the custodian’s policies for scientific, data governance, and financial approvals (see www.cprd.com). All bona fide researchers can apply to use the UK Biobank data set for health-related research. A guide to access is also provided on the UK Biobank website (see www.ukbiobank.ac.uk).

PubMed id: 36031541


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
British Heart Foundation
FS/19/36/34346
ES/P011055/1
FS/19/64/34673
HL134894
National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Oxford Martin School
PG/18/65/33872
UKRI

Share