Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Petros PerrosORCiD
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Copyright 2024, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers. Background: Hypothyroidism is common, however, aspects of its treatment remain controversial. Our survey aimed at documenting treatment choices of European thyroid specialists and exploring how patients' persistent symptoms, clinician demographics, and geo-economic factors relate to treatment choices. Methods: Seventeen thousand two hundred forty-seven thyroid specialists from 28 countries were invited to participate in an online questionnaire survey. The survey included respondent demographic data and treatment choices for hypothyroid patients with persistent symptoms. Geo-economic data for each country were included in the analyses. Results: The response rate was 32.9% (6058 respondents out of 17,247 invitees). Levothyroxine (LT4) was the initial treatment preferred by the majority (98.3%). Persistent symptoms despite normal serum thyrotropin (TSH) while receiving LT4 treatment were reported to affect up to 10.0% of patients by 75.4% of respondents, while 28.4% reported an increasing such trend in the past 5 years. The principal explanations offered for patients' persistent symptoms were psychosocial factors (77.1%), comorbidities (69.2%), and unrealistic patient expectations (61.0%). Combination treatment with LT4+liothyronine (LT3) was chosen by 40.0% of respondents for patients who complained of persistent symptoms despite a normal TSH. This option was selected more frequently by female thyroid specialists, with high-volume practice, working in countries with high gross national income per capita. Conclusions: The perception of patients' dissatisfaction reported by physicians seems lower than that described by hypothyroid patients in previous surveys. LT4+LT3 treatment is used frequently by thyroid specialists in Europe for persistent hypothyroid-like symptoms even if they generally attribute such symptoms to nonendocrine causes and despite the evidence of nonsuperiority of the combined over the LT4 therapy. Pressure by dissatisfied patients on their physicians for LT3-containing treatments is a likely explanation. The association of the therapeutic choices with the clinician demographic characteristics and geo-economic factors in Europe is a novel information and requires further investigation.
Author(s): Attanasio R, Zarkovic M, Papini E, Nagy EV, Negro R, Perros P, Akarsu E, Alevizaki M, Ayvaz G, Bednarczuk T, Beleslin BN, Berta E, Bodor M, Borissova AM, Boyanov M, Buffet C, Burlacu M-C, Ciric J, Diez JJ, Dobnig H, Fadeyev V, Field BC, Fliers E, Fuhrer-Sakel D, Galofre JC, Hakala T, Jiskra J, Kopp PA, Krebs M, Krsek M, Kuzma M, Lantz M, Lazurova I, Leenhardt L, Luchytskiy V, Marques Puga F, McGowan A, Metso S, Moran C, Morgunova T, Niculescu DA, Peric B, Planck T, Poiana C, Robenshtok E, Rosselet PO, Ruchala M, Riis KR, Shepelkevich A, Tronko MD, Unuane D, Vardarli I, Visser WE, Vryonidou A, Younes YR, Hegedus L
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Thyroid
Year: 2024
Volume: 34
Issue: 4
Pages: 429-441
Print publication date: 01/04/2024
Online publication date: 18/02/2024
Acceptance date: 02/04/2018
ISSN (print): 1050-7256
ISSN (electronic): 1557-9077
Publisher: Mary Ann Liebert Inc.
URL: https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2023.0580
DOI: 10.1089/thy.2023.0580
PubMed id: 38368541
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric