Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Fabrice StephensonORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
© 2024 The Authors. Diversity and Distributions published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Aim: Spatial assessments of Ecosystem Services (ES) are increasingly used in environmental management, but rarely provide information on the prediction accuracy. Uncertainty estimates are essential to provide confidence in the quality and credibility of ES assessments for informed decision making. In marine environments, the need for uncertainty assessments for ES is unparalleled as they are data scarce, poorly (spatially) defined, with complex interconnectivity of seascapes. This study illustrates the uncertainty associated with a principle-based method for ES modelling by accounting for model variability, data coverage and uncertainty in thresholds and parameters. Location: Tauranga, New Zealand. Methods: A sensitivity analysis was applied on ES models for marine bivalves (Austrovenus stutchburyi and Paphies australis) and their contribution to Food provision, Water quality regulation, Nitrogen removal and Sediment stabilisation. ES estimates from the sensitivity analysis were compared against baseline ES predictions. Spatial uncertainty patterns were analysed for individual ES through bi-plots and multiple ES through spatial prioritisation using Zonation. Results: Our study showed spatially explicit differences in uncertainty patterns for ES and between species. Food provision had highest maximum uncertainty (>5 points) but also the largest area of high ES and high certainty conditions. Zonation analysis conducted on baseline and conservative ES values showed overall robust outcomes of top 30% area, but important nuances through shifts in top 5% and 10% areas that allowed for a consistently better representation of ES when accounting for uncertainty. Main Conclusions: The spatial prioritisation in combination with the ES uncertainty biplots provide tools for spatial planning of individual and multiple ES to focus on area of highest value with highest certainty and can thereby help reduce risk and aid decision-making at acceptable confidence levels. This type of information is urgently needed in marine ES assessments and their management, but likewise extends to other environments to improve transparency.
Author(s): Rullens V, Stephenson F, Townsend M, Lohrer AM, Hewitt JE, Pilditch CA, Ellis JI
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Diversity and Distributions
Year: 2024
Pages: epub ahead of print
Online publication date: 29/03/2024
Acceptance date: 12/02/2024
Date deposited: 17/04/2024
ISSN (print): 1366-9516
ISSN (electronic): 1472-4642
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc
URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13823
DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13823
Data Access Statement: Data are made available on Dryad at https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad. wm37pvmsf.
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
