Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Helen RogersORCiD, Rachel Goldsmith
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
© The Author(s) 2024.Background: Current evidence in cariology teaching is not consistently reflected in paediatric dentistry in the United Kingdom (UK). Many dental schools are not consistently teaching biological approaches to caries management, with outdated or complex methods being taught outwith the purview of general dental practitioners. This scoping review aimed to map current guidelines on the management of caries in children and young people. This is part of a work package to inform the consensus and development of a UK-wide caries management curriculum for paediatric dentistry. Methods: A search of electronic databases for peer reviewed literature was performed using Cochrane Library, MEDLINE via PubMed, TRIP Medical Database and Web of Science. Hand searching was undertaken for grey literature (citations of sources of evidence, websites of global organisations and Google Web Search™ (Google LLC, California, USA). Results from databases were screened independently, concurrently by two reviewers. Full texts were obtained, and reviewers met to discuss any disagreement for both database and hand searching. Results: This review identified 16 guidelines suitable for inclusion. After quality appraisal, eight were selected for synthesis and interpretation. Key themes included the shift towards selective caries removal and avoidance of complete caries removal unless in specific circumstances in anterior teeth. For “early lesions” in primary and permanent teeth with and without cavitation, several guidelines recommend biological management including site specific prevention and fissure sealants. Conclusions: This review mapping current cariology guidelines for children and young people found gaps in the literature including classification of early carious lesions and management of early cavitated lesions. Areas identified for further exploration include integration of biological caries management into treatment planning, selective caries removal and whether pulpotomy is specialist-level treatment, requiring referral. These results will inform consensus recommendations in the UK, using Delphi methods.
Author(s): Campbell F, Rogers H, Goldsmith R, Rowles K, Raggio DP, Innes N
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: BMC Oral Health
Year: 2024
Volume: 24
Issue: 1
Online publication date: 26/04/2024
Acceptance date: 19/04/2024
Date deposited: 08/07/2024
ISSN (electronic): 1472-6831
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd
URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04278-7
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04278-7
Data Access Statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
PubMed id: 38671432
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
