Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

"You don't get side effects from social prescribing"—A qualitative study exploring community pharmacists' attitudes to social prescribing

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Adam RathboneORCiD, Nia Cartwright, Professor Gill Rowlands, Dr Laura LindseyORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

Copyright: © 2024 Rathbone et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. OBJECTIVES: Social prescribing is an approach that enables the referral of patients to non-clinical support and places a focus on holistic care. This study explored views of community pharmacists regarding social prescribing in pharmacies. STUDY DESIGN: A qualitative phenomenological approach was used. METHODS: A convenience sample of eleven community pharmacists from Northern England were recruited via social media (Twitter, Facebook) and took part in a semi-structured, one-to-one qualitative interviews that asked about their knowledge of social prescribing, the advantages of community pharmacist involvement and any barriers they predicted to its implementation. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. RESULTS: The sample included largely male pharmacists (63.3%) with less than five years' experience (45.5%) and included pharmacists working as employees (63.6%), locums (27.3%) and owners (9%) in both chain (36%) and independent stores (54.5%). The main findings indicate an enthusiasm for but limited understanding of social prescribing. Factors which appeared to influence involvement were training requirements and time available to complete an additional service in busy pharmacies. Opportunities centred on the broader pharmacy team's role to optimise health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate pharmacists may be an underused resource due to a poor understanding of the full scale and scope of social prescribing beyond health promotion, lifestyle interventions. Further work is needed to explore the transferability of the findings to the broader pharmacy workforce to understand how social prescribing can be positioned within pharmacy practice.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Rathbone AP, Pearson H, Akinyemi O, Cartwright N, Tierney S, Rowlands G, Lindsey L

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: PLoS ONE

Year: 2024

Volume: 19

Issue: 5

Online publication date: 16/05/2024

Acceptance date: 09/03/2024

Date deposited: 28/05/2024

ISSN (electronic): 1932-6203

Publisher: Public Library of Science

URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301076

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301076

Data Access Statement: There are ethical and legal restrictions on sharing the de-identified data set. Participants did not give explicit consent for the de-identified data set to be shared as participants were told the data would be kept confidential. Anonymized data is held at an online repository under embargo. This restriction is imposed by the University Ethics Committee. Please contact rdm@ncl.ac.uk for further information.

PubMed id: 38753861


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share