Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Michael AshworthORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This paper interrogates the depoliticising effects of a seemingly neutral regulatory drive at the heart of the World Health Organization (WHO)'s promotion of traditional medicine. Emerging at WHO in the late 1960s against a political backdrop of decolonisation and pan-Africanism, traditional medicine has continued to be promoted in subsequent decades, culminating in the latest global Traditional Medicine Strategy (2014 to 2023). Yet WHO's promotion and acceptance of traditional medicine have also become increasingly conditional upon its standardisation and regulation – something that appears fundamentally at odds with traditional medicine's heterogeneity. Drawing on insights from critical law and science and technology studies, we suggest that such a process at WHO has done more than simply disqualify the toxic and the dangerous. Rather, it has implicitly and explicitly marginalised and excluded those aspects of traditional medicine that deviate from scientific, biomedical ways of seeing, knowing and organising.
Author(s): Ashworth M, Cloatre E
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: International Journal of Law in Context
Year: 2022
Volume: 18
Issue: 4
Pages: 476-498
Print publication date: 01/12/2022
Online publication date: 19/04/2022
Acceptance date: 01/03/2022
Date deposited: 28/06/2024
ISSN (print): 1744-5523
ISSN (electronic): 1744-5531
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552322000143
DOI: 10.1017/S1744552322000143
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric