Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Neurocognitive performance in functional neurological disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Izzy Williams

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© 2024 The Author(s). European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology. Background and purpose: Cognitive complaints are common in functional neurological disorder (FND), but it is unclear whether objective neurocognitive deficits are present. This systematic review summarized validated/standardized cognitive test performance in FND samples across cognitive domains. Methods: Embase, PsycInfo and MEDLINE were searched from inception to 15 May 2023, combining terms for FND and cognitive domains (e.g., attention, memory, executive functioning). Studies included a range of FND phenotypes (seizures, motor, cognitive disorder, mixed), compared to healthy or clinical controls. Risk of bias was assessed with the modified Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and a qualitative synthesis/narrative review of cognitive performance in FND was conducted. Test performance scores were extracted, and random effects meta-analyses were run where appropriate. This review was registered on PROSPERO, CRD42023423139. Results: Fifty-six studies including 2260 individuals with FND were eligible. Although evidence for some impairments emerged across domains of executive functioning, attention, memory and psychomotor/processing speed, this was inconsistent across studies and FND phenotypes. Common confounds included group differences in demographics, medication and intellectual functioning. Only 24% of studies objectively assessed performance validity. Meta-analyses revealed higher scores on tests of naming (g = 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50, 0.84) and long-term memory (g = 0.43, 95% CI 0.13, 0.74) in functional seizures versus epilepsy, but no significant differences in working (g = −0.08, 95% CI −0.44, 0.29) or immediate (g = 0.25, 95% CI −0.02, 0.53) memory and cognitive flexibility (g = −0.01, 95% CI −0.29, 0.28). Conclusions: There is mixed evidence for objective cognitive deficits in FND. Future research should control for confounds, include tests of performance validity, and assess relationships between objective and subjective neurocognitive functioning.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Millman LSM, Williams IA, Jungilligens J, Pick S

Publication type: Review

Publication status: Published

Journal: European Journal of Neurology

Year: 2024

Pages: ePub ahead of Print

Online publication date: 02/07/2024

Acceptance date: 30/05/2024

ISSN (print): 1351-5101

ISSN (electronic): 1468-1331

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc

URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.16386

DOI: 10.1111/ene.16386

Data Access Statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Share