Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

RIPPLE-VT study: Multicenter prospective evaluation of ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation by targeting scar channels to eliminate latest scar potentials without direct ablation

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Ruairidh Martin, Dr Moloy Das

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

© 2024Background: Recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) can be treated by substrate modification of the myocardial scar by catheter ablation during sinus rhythm without VT induction. Better defining this arrhythmic substrate could help improve outcome and reduce ablation burden. Objective: The study aimed to limit ablation within postinfarction scar to conduction channels within the scar to reduce VT recurrence. Methods: Patients undergoing catheter ablation for recurrent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy for postinfarction VT were recruited at 5 centers. Left ventricular maps were collected on CARTO using a Pentaray catheter. Ripple mapping was used to categorize infarct scar potentials (SPs) by timing. Earliest SPs were ablated sequentially until there was loss of the terminal SPs without their direct ablation. The primary outcome measure was sustained VT episodes as documented by device interrogations at 1 year, which was compared with VT episodes in the year before ablation. Results: The study recruited 50 patients (mean left ventricular ejection fraction, 33% ± 9%), and 37 patients (74%) met the channel ablation end point with successful loss of latest SPs without direct ablation. There were 16 recurrences during 1-year follow-up. There was a 90% reduction in VT burden from 30.2 ± 53.9 to 3.1 ± 7.5 (P < .01) per patient, with a concomitant 88% reduction in appropriate shocks from 2.1 ± 2.7 to 0.2 ± 0.9 (P < .01). There were 8 deaths during follow-up. Those who met the channel ablation end point had no significant difference in mortality, recurrence, or VT burden but had a significantly lower ablation burden of 25.7 ± 4.2 minutes vs 39.9 ± 6.1 minutes (P = .001). Conclusion: Scar channel ablation is feasible by ripple mapping and can be an alternative to more extensive substrate modification techniques.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Katritsis G, Kailey B, Jamil-Copley S, Luther V, Koa-Wing M, Cortez-Dias N, Carpinteiro L, de Sousa J, Martin R, Murray S, Das M, Whinnett Z, Lim PB, Peters NS, Ng FS, Chow AW, Linton NWF, Kanagaratnam P

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Heart Rhythm

Year: 2024

Pages: epub ahead of print

Online publication date: 05/06/2024

Acceptance date: 02/04/2018

ISSN (print): 1547-5271

ISSN (electronic): 1556-3871

Publisher: Elsevier B.V.

URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.05.046

DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.05.046

PubMed id: 38848856


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share