Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Michael AshworthORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This paper employs a governmentality framework to explore resistance by CAM sceptics to homeopathy’s partial settlement in the public health systems of England and France, resulting in its defunding in both countries in 2018 and 2021, respectively. While partly dependent upon long-standing problematisations (namely, that homeopathy’s ability to heal is unproven, its mechanisms implausible, and its consequences for patients potentially dangerous), the defunding of homeopathy was also driven by the conduct of CAM sceptics, who undermined homeopathy’s position in strikingly different ways in both contexts. This difference, we suggest, is a consequence of the diverging regulatory arrangements surrounding homeopathy (and CAMs more generally) in England and France—and the ambivalent effects of CAM’s regulation. If law and regulation have been a key component of CAM’s integration and (partial) acceptance over the past four decades, the fortunes of homeopathy in England and France highlight their unpredictability as techniques of governmentality: just as the formal regulatory systems in England and France have helped to normalise homeopathy in different ways, they have also incited and galvanised opposition, providing specific anchor-points for resistance by CAM sceptics.
Author(s): Ashworth M, Cloatre E
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Social Theory & Health
Year: 2024
Pages: ePub ahead of Print
Online publication date: 20/08/2024
Acceptance date: 10/08/2024
Date deposited: 13/09/2024
ISSN (print): 1477-8211
ISSN (electronic): 1477-822X
Publisher: Springer Nature
URL: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-024-00215-4
DOI: 10.1057/s41285-024-00215-4
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
