Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Noemi SinkovicsORCiD
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Purpose This paper aims to propose an integrative framework that enables the mapping of firm activities along two dimensions of responsible business behavior: a width and a depth dimension. Width includes associative, peripheral, operational and embedded responsibility. In terms of depth, we identify delinquent, neutral, nascent, enhanced and advanced levels of responsibility. Design/methodology/approach: The responsibility matrix is developed by drawing on the literature and the ambition to provide a more nuanced map of a firm’s activities and its contributions toward the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Findings: The matrix enables the classification of firm activities into different functional categories based on how they relate to a firm’s business model. Further, the meaningfulness of each activity can be identified by determining its depth. Research limitations/implications: Mapping all the relevant activities of a multinational firm onto the responsibility matrix enables managers and policymakers to identify areas where transformation is most needed. Further, multinational firms can use the matrix to map the activities of their value chain partners and design more effective standards and interventions. Practical implications: The business responsibility matrix represents a diagnostic tool that enables the detailed mapping of firm capabilities and the identification of areas where further capacity building is necessary and where pockets of excellence exist. Social implications: The responsibility matrix offers a benchmarking tool for progress that can be used in conjunction with existing guidelines and initiatives such as the United Nations (UN) Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the UN Global Compact and the Global Reporting Initiative. Originality/value: The responsibility matrix acknowledges that firms can engage with the SDGs through different types of activity (width dimension). Simultaneously, it recognizes that activities in the same category can have varying levels of effectiveness (depth dimension).
Author(s): Sinkovics N, Sinkovics RR, Archie-Acheampong J
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Multinational Business Review
Year: 2021
Volume: 29
Issue: 1
Pages: 1-20
Print publication date: 07/01/2021
Online publication date: 06/12/2020
Acceptance date: 20/09/2020
ISSN (print): 1525-383X
Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited
URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-07-2020-0154
DOI: 10.1108/MBR-07-2020-0154
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
