Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Optimising recovery of DNA from minimally invasive sampling methods: Efficacy of buccal swabs, preservation strategy and DNA extraction approaches for amphibian studies

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Simon MaddockORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© 2024 The Author(s). Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Studies in evolution, ecology and conservation are increasingly based on genetic and genomic data. With increased focus on molecular approaches, ethical concerns about destructive or more invasive techniques need to be considered, with a push for minimally invasive sampling to be optimised. Buccal swabs have been increasingly used to collect DNA in a number of taxa, including amphibians. However, DNA yield and purity from swabs are often low, limiting its use. In this study, we compare different types of swabs, preservation method and storage, and DNA extraction techniques in three case studies to assess the optimal approach for recovering DNA in anurans. Out of the five different types of swabs that we tested, Isohelix MS-02 and Rapidry swabs generated higher DNA yields than other swabs. When comparing storage buffers, ethanol is a better preservative than a non-alcoholic alternative. Dried samples resulted in similar or better final DNA yields compared to ethanol-fixed samples if kept cool. DNA extraction via a Qiagen™ DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit and McHale's salting-out extraction method resulted in similar DNA yields but the Qiagen™ kit extracts contained less contamination. We also found that samples have better DNA recovery if they are frozen as soon as possible after collection. We provide recommendations for sample collection and extraction under different conditions, including budgetary considerations, size of individual animal sampled, access to cold storage facilities and DNA extraction methodology. Maximising efficacy of all of these factors for better DNA recovery will allow buccal swabs to be used for genetic and genomic studies in a range of vertebrates.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Martin R, Mullin KE, White NFD, Grimason N, Jehle R, Wilkinson JW, Orozco-terWengel P, Cunningham AA, Maddock ST

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Ecology and Evolution

Year: 2024

Volume: 14

Issue: 9

Online publication date: 01/09/2024

Acceptance date: 29/08/2024

Date deposited: 24/09/2024

ISSN (print): 2045-7758

ISSN (electronic): 2045-7758

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Ltd

URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70294

DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70294

Data Access Statement: All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article, its supplementary information files and publicly available repositories at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo. 11203693.


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
BB/M009122/1
BBSRC
NE/L002434/1
NERC

Share