Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Elizabeth SchlappaORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
As the founding work of the eighteenth-century anti-masturbation campaign, Onania (c. 1716) owed its tremendous popularity to the lurid readers’ letters which enlivened its ever-expanding editions. Despite their notoriety, Onania’s letters have escaped sustained analysis. This article reexamines Onania's place in the history of gender, using the readers' letters as the basis for a qualitative analysis of its portrayal of female masturbators. Thematic comparison between male and female letters illuminates the differing significance of men’s and women’s self-pleasure in the gendered social world of Georgian England. Moreover, Onania’s letters positioned women’s masturbation as threatening by playing on long-standing mistrust about female sexuality: self-pollution confirmed men's worst suspicions about how women behaved in secret. The widely noted voyeurism of some of Onania's female letters was thus more than simple prurience: it enabled men to witness, consume, and reclaim a private form of female sexuality from which they were otherwise excluded. By drawing out the themes in Onania's letters, this study illustrates how the inception of the anti-masturbation campaign was saturated by gendered calls to alarm about female sexuality.
Author(s): Schlappa E
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Journal of the History of Sexuality
Year: 2023
Volume: 32
Issue: 2
Pages: 313-336
Print publication date: 01/09/2023
Acceptance date: 20/12/2022
Date deposited: 15/10/2024
ISSN (print): 1535-3605
Publisher: University of Texas Press
URL: https://doi.org/10.7560/JHS32304
DOI: 10.7560/JHS32304
ePrints DOI: 10.57711/gb2x-xa61
Notes: A post-print version of this article (accepted version pre-copyedits) is now available open access.
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
